1969: A Space Fallacy - Chapter One of Three
Open the Pod Bay Doors and Enter.
It was one small step for man, one giant leap in hoaxes?
This is about something I’ve had doubts about for much of my life and is still today, rightly so, a regular talking point. Though despite it being an extremely entry-level “Conspiracy Theory” it still manages to trigger people who are under the laughable notion that no one has ever conspired with others to achieve a goal before. If that is you I still hope you’ll stay as I feel the subject can be interesting and entertaining regardless of your leanings.
It’s something that allegedly happened at a time where the entire computational power of those behind it can today probably be found in the average persons living room, but has yet to be replicated since the original missions decades ago. The title gave it away a bit let’s be honest.
Yes, I’m of course talking about the US reporting that they’d landed humans on the Moon in 1969.
Using this:
…something that looks like a school project using tinfoil, craft paper and scotch-tape:
…which somehow didn’t even leave any kind of blast crater according to these images:
Now you may absolutely believe they did land on the Moon. Might find elements a bit dubious. Or could be convinced they faked the entire thing. As alluded to above this piece welcomes all of you, though the latter are likely well aware already of what I want to touch on specifically (which I find fascinating regardless).
The fact is there are countless (actually not-so-true now so many have been scrubbed from existence) videos online which show how the official NASA footage doesn’t quite (can be an understatement) add up at times. Not just with relation to the Moon Landing™️ but odd things going on with people and objects apparently on the International Space Station and the like (but let’s not get too side-tracked right now with the other shenanigans of NASA and various conclusions therein). These things pique the interest of a curious, open, and/or sceptical mind.
With regards to landing humans on the Moon I suppose that it could of course be possible that they did do that, but that the footage was perhaps so poor they had to “Photoshop” a bunch later for Public Relations. That’s plausible. Though how they got through the so-called ‘Van Allen Belts’ remains a bit of a mystery. But even if they did land on the Moon and just had to put out fake PR content, they’d still be deceiving people…oh and by the way, the point of this article is not to highlight “reasons they didn’t actually land on the Moon” but instead essentially start with that being an *accepted* premise (you don’t actually have to accept it of course but that’s not really my point…you’ll see what I mean if you keep reading).
Getting back to deceptions; if they’d be prepared to deceive the entire Earth over something as monumental as having men walk on our “natural satellite”, why not save themselves the trouble of actually bothering to try and land on the Moon? Why not just pay a fraction of the cost to some, I don’t know, Hollywood Director instead..?
Same conclusion can be applied if they fully intended to go the Moon and realised it wasn’t going to be possible, but wanted to win this part of The Space Race™️ against those pesky Soviets at any cost and so they resorted to a hoax (bit like the plot of the movie ‘Capricorn One’ (1977), in which “a reporter discovers that a supposed Mars landing by a crewed mission to the planet has been faked via a conspiracy involving the government and—under duress—the crew themselves”).
“But how would they keep the secret so long if that were true?!”, I hear you ask. Good point. It’s not like high-ranking members of Secret Societies are known for keeping secrets or anything.. 😉
…well, at least until more senior years perhaps(?):
Right well if it was a piece of theatre who might have helped create it? Again, the title of this article probably gives it away a little bit…
In 1968 an exceptional piece of cinema was released. It was called ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’, based on the work of Arthur C. Clarke, Produced and Directed by Mister Stanley Kubrick:
…whoops sorry…that’s an official NASA image, not a movie set. Here we go:
If you haven’t watched it you must. In fact I would highly recommend his work in general. Some would suggest he had an inside-track on the true nature of our reality and the powers who shape it. One such example would be his movie ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ (1999), but back to the topic once again.
*illuminati intensifies*
So yes, 1968; what an interesting time for such a movie to release no? Was it perhaps a practice-run at the types of effects they’d need to use to convince the unsuspecting masses that humans had achieved something seemingly impossible? Might NASA at least ask him to consult given he’d know the types of effects required (such as Front Screen Projection and model sets) to produce a convincing film instead of doing it for real?
No. Surely not. Unfathomable nonsense. All pure coincidence as usual!
Except, well, it has long been theorised there’s actually “evidence” Kubrick created an elaborate mea culpa coded confession about the (very likely) *actual* story regarding the historic moment for those who knew where to look. But I’m not talking about the “hoax admission” video out there because personally I do believe this one being “debunked”:
…not because the family (in 2016 his daughter Vivian said the truther crowd discussing the possibility are “malicious cranks” which is interesting given the heavily anti-Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab & Agenda 2030 type tweets from her in 2021) or media said so. Don’t be silly. But because I’ve seen clips of it before where the man, supposedly Kubrick, appears to be fluffing his lines and the interviewer seems to call him a different name whilst coaching him on what to say (to which he then feigns surprise at once it’s recited back). But of course I’d recommend you have a search and watch yourself if interested in it…
What I want to get into instead is the “evidence” found within his body of work. And although if you look hard enough and want something to prove your theory you can find connections where they are merely coincidence, there seems to be a considerable amount of elements which scream admission. On the other hand it could also have been Kubrick trolling us all given the existing rumours he helped the US do a hoax.
You will have to make up your own mind as to whether there’s something to this or not after I lay said elements out for you.